| ECS-L Home Automation and Security Archives |
| Subject: From: Date: | Re: RE: RE: RE: [ECS] Alarm suggestions Steven Wegman Wed, 09 Sep 1998 00:03:18 -0400 |
Why don't people use the Inovonics panel (48 zone, hard wired and wireless). This panel works well with ECS for DOS (two-way communication). According to Mark, the code for the Inovonics panel is also built into ECS for WIN, but he has not tested it, and thus, does not "advertise" it. I have not had the time to install ECS for WIN to see if it truely does work, mainly because (due to a past crash) I have no more installs left, and do not wish to "lose" the last one. At some point, (after I return from CEDIA) I will contact Mark about this. Steve Wegman At 01:54 PM 9/8/98 -0400, you wrote: >Thanks for the info Terry. I am going to look further into Napco >Gemini. > >Dan Dubay > >>>> Martin Terry <Martin.Terry@mail.tribnet.com> 09/08 11:29 AM >>> >Dan, sorry it took so long to reply to this, but I've spent most of >the >weekend running cables in my house. > >Looks like the DSC 832 will not pan out as well as I had hoped. The >serial connection works fine and I can see how the transfer is being >made however there are two things that make it basically unusable with >ECS. > >1. You have to initiate the serial connection from a kepad with a >code. >2. While the serial connection is active the keypads are completely >locked out! > >Oddly enough, dial up into the panel does not have to be initiated >each >time as the serial connection. I'm still working on the wiring but I >plan on seeing if I can dial up and query the panel for a few >statuses. >This however would take too long for any real time interaction. > >I can still arm/disarm the panel from ECS with a relay closure by >setting up the panel with a keyswitch zone. I can also read the armed >status with a digital item. I cannot however determine these via the >serial port due to the problems noted above. > >Oh well, it was a fun exercise! > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daniel Dubay [SMTP:ddubay@umich.edu] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 1998 4:48 PM >> To: ecs-list@vancouver.ml.org >> Subject: Re: RE: RE: [ECS] Alarm suggestions >> >> Hello Terry, >> >> The Serial analyzer software you have sounds pretty good. I've >> recently heard some good things about this DSC system. When you >> figure >> out the comand set can you attach a copy to the email? >> >> What do these intercoms look like. sounds like a nice way to give >ECS >> voice. Where are you buying your equipment from? Thanks for the >> info. >> >> Dan Dubay >> >> >>> Martin Terry <Martin.Terry@mail.tribnet.com> 08/25 11:42 PM >>> >> Well, since it connects to the PC's serial port, I am guessing it is >> using ASCII to communicate. >> >> I've already ordered the unit, and I have the software provided by >> DSC. >> I plan on connecting a serial port analyzer, using the software to >get >> status, see what ASCII codes are sent to the device, and what ASCII >> codes are returned and how these codes translate (armed, alarm, >etc.). >> I >> do this for all the functions I'm interested in controlling via ECS. >> >> So far things look promising. It appears there is an initial >> "handshake" >> between the software and the unit, but the docs state that once that >> has >> occured there is no timeout of the serial link, meaning once you've >> logged in, you don't have to do it again unless you log out. >> >> One of the cool things about this unit is that everything is >software >> controllable, including all the ancillary cards like the intercom >card >> I'm interested in. Using a "broadcast mask" function, I can pick the >> stations I want to receive an announce, send the announcement via >ECS, >> then turn on all the stations again. >> >> You can even answer the phone directly from the intercom. You can >also >> send text to the 32 chararcter LCD keypads. Lots of cool stuff. >> >> Unless there's some incredibly tricky timing involved in the >protocol, >> this should be a piece of cake to reverse engineer. >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Daniel Dubay [SMTP:ddubay@umich.edu] >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 1998 1:39 PM >> > To: ecs-list@vancouver.ml.org >> > Subject: Re: RE: [ECS] Alarm suggestions >> > >> > Terry, I have easy access to Gemini and it has the features I >want. >> > I >> > can get a good price through Home Controls dealer program. I >would >> be >> > interested in looking at the DSC system. Is it available through >> ADI? >> > >> > Either way we need a protocol to work with these systems. ECS >needs >> > to >> > know the commands to send to the system. I don't know if your >> serial >> > analyzer can monitor commands sent by proprietary software? >> > >> > Dan Dubay >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Martin Terry <Martin.Terry@mail.tribnet.com> 08/24 1:25 PM >>> >> > Thanks for the Input Dan. Why are you going with the Gemini may I >> ask? >> > The DSC unit supports a serial link to PC and although I haven't >> found >> > the protocol, I do have their software and an serial analyzer :) >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Daniel Dubay [SMTP:ddubay@umich.edu] >> > > Sent: Monday, August 24, 1998 7:35 AM >> > > To: ecs-list@vancouver.ml.org >> > > Subject: Re: RE: [ECS] Final CID questions >> > > >> > > Hello Martin, >> > > >> > > I prefer a stand alone system. One of the principals of >> > > professionally >> > > integrated systems is to use stand alone subsystems. Although >ECS >> > is >> > > very stable, I sometimes cause instability with my own changes. >> > > >> > > I am considering the inovonics hardwired system (only six >inputs) >> vs >> > a >> > > Napco Gemini system (not directly supported by ECS). I am >trying >> to >> > > obtain their protocol. >> > > >> > > Dan Dubay >> > > >> > > >>> "Michael David" <michael@michaeldavid.com> 08/23 9:48 PM >>> >> > > Hi Martin! >> > > >> > > I use ECS as my alarm system, with hardwired sensors connected >to >> my >> > > digital >> > > inputs, and Inovonics wireless transmitters sending signals to >the >> > > Inovonics >> > > receiver that's supported by ECS. Works great. I have yet to >> think >> > > of >> > > any >> > > reason to go with a stand-alone system. >> > > >> > > Cheers! >> > > >> > > Michael David >> > > michael@michaeldavid.com >> > > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Martin Terry [mailto:Martin.Terry@mail.tribnet.com] >> > > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 1998 1:35 PM >> > > To: 'ecs-list@vancouver.ml.org' >> > > Subject: RE: [ECS] Final CID questions >> > > >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > I'm thinking of buying a DSC 832 alarm system and it's optional >> > > intercom. Anyone out there have experience with this unit? I'm >> > > currently >> > > thinking of ways to interface the alarm status with ECS, but it >> > looks >> > > difficult at best. >> > > >> > > I do think interfacing with the intercom should be easy enough. >> > > >> > > What are you folks doing in this reguard? I realize there's a >> brand >> > of >> > > alarm already supported by ECS but how's it compare in price to >> the >> > > DSC >> > > unit (which I consider dirt cheap, <$200 for the panel and 1 >> > keypad). >> > > >