|
ECS-L Home Automation and Security Archives |
learn more
| view messages for this
month | NetBloc® | terms of use | search
subject (prev) or (next) |
time (prev) or (next) |
author (prev) or (next) |
view more subjects
Subject: From: Date: | Re: [ECS] micro-redac and relays David Mccoll Mon, 4 Jan 1999 01:50:37 -0800 |
Mark, Dan,
The Redac's inputs are optically isolated and better not "co-mingle". I use
more than one power source with the ground wires connected in common to pins
9-10 on the Redac and have no trouble.
I'm concerned about the lag and basically want to put a small "load" on the
plug-pak. That is why I recommended the resistor. "Load" the plug-pak with
a very small lightbulb like a mini-Xmas tree bulb somewhere before the fuse,
resistor and Redac. A bulb from a cars dashboard could be used. The bulb
would be on when the receiver is on. If this works then we can simulate the
bulb with a resistor.
Resistor Fuse
+ --------\--------/\/\/\/-------~~-----Input on Redac 1-8
Plug-Pak (o) Light
- --------/-----------------------------Pin 9 or 10 on
Redac
Are you certain the plug-pak has a DC output ?
DAvid M
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sekelsky <Mark@sekelsky.com>
To: ecs-list@netbloc.com <ecs-list@netbloc.com>
Date: Monday, January 04, 1999 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: [ECS] micro-redac and relays
>David & Dan,
>
>Sorry to take so long to get back regarding your continued suggestions on
my
>Redac and receiver. Spent the weekend shoveling out from all the snow and
>had no phone service at all on Sunday (: A couple more questions (I don't
>promise that they are the last <g>) if I may. Both of the most recent
>suggestions are a little over my head, although I am sure I could
eventually
>figure it out. So question number one is:
>
>What if I just leave everything the way it is? While not excited about the
>9" delay in changing the state to HIGH it is not a big deal. The big
reason
>that I want to check power is that neither the IR Master nor a HV that I
>played with have been able to control my receiver 100%. My event already
>incorporates a delay on and off timer so that I can resend the signal if
the
>state of the receiver isn't changed. I was using a 6" delay to test for
OFF
>but all I have done now is increase it to 12." Even if my response time is
>instantaneous I will incorporate some type of delay check.
>
>Question number two. Could I take the diode that Dan recommends and attach
>that to the Redac in my existing system?
>
>Mark S
>
subject (prev) or (next) |
time (prev) or (next) |
author (prev) or (next) |
view more subjects