| ECS-L Home Automation and Security Archives |
| Subject: From: Date: | Re: [ECS] "DOS based " Dan Carrington Tue, 26 Jan 1999 18:12:21 -0800 |
I suppose I had one great benefit in that I had the automation for 4 years before I had anyone else living with me. I just had to modify a few routines for my wife and duplicate things that I did for me for her. Probably much easier that way than full from scratch automation with other people in the house having to live with my bugs. I also had a fairly full arsenal of automation hardware by that time, so the automation could do many things beyond just ECS and an X-10 interface. Keep your chin up, and carefully persuade her away from the "dark" side. Dan Carrington Kevin Keast wrote: > > Dan, > > I must hand it to your wife. Sounds like a definate pro-ha person. That is > great. It is the misfortunes that hurt me. I am learning to beta test > EVERYTHING while my spouse is away so the impact is minimal when I get the > system online. > > Kevin :() > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dan Carrington [mailto:dc_grafx@microworks.net] > > Sent: Monday, January 25, 1999 3:32 PM > > To: ecs-list@netbloc.com > > Subject: Re: [ECS] "DOS based " > > > > > > I would have to say, the spousal resistance factor would vary with the > > person and the automation. My wife loves our automated house. She > > likes the announcing of me coming home before someone is messing with > > the lock on the door. She likes the button that has ECS tell her if any > > doors are left open. She loves the same feature when we shut down the > > house at night. She loves the multi-person and weekday/weekend > > automatic wakeup alarms with lights and radio. She likes the radios > > around the house that all switch to the same source when you play a CD. > > She likes the radios that automatically switch to the best radio > > programs by day and time, avoiding the stupid talk shows. She love the > > alarm system that she doesn't have to ever punch in a key code. She > > loves the driveway light that turns on when she comes home so she can > > see anybody lurking around and she can see when she gets out of the > > car. She loves only hitting one button to turn on and off my > > complicated theater system. But most of all, she loves the automatic > > lights. She and I always make funny comments to each other when > > visiting our families out of town when we have to remember to turn a > > light when we walk into a room. > > Now, she doesn't know the interface on the computer, but she could > > easily learn it if she cared to. I also run any programing I am > > planning by her for her feedback on the changes in the house and to see > > if she has any better ideas on how to easily program the new feature. > > (I do have to admit that she is computer and Audio/Video savvy. She > > also has had more programing classes than I have had.) But in the > > overall sense, she has no spousal resistance to automation. We must > > remember in our hobbies, to ask what they want out of it and put some of > > those things into our programing. > > > > Dan Carrington > > > > > > > > > > "Bass, Bill" wrote: > > > > > > The "spousal resistance factor" to home automation is pretty > > > high in my home, and I suspect this is true for many others > > > as well (I am slowly making progress by adding capabilities > > > to the home one piece at a time. The greatest impression I > > > have made on her so far, is getting the light over the stove > > > to come on automatically when someone walks into the kitchen). > > > Unfortunately, ECS is not something I can show off to my > > > wife to impress her that it is worth the purchase price. A > > > slick looking GUI would certainly increase the "Gee Whiz" > > > factor and make it easier for us "converts" to sell it to the > > > "heathens". Meanwhile, I am anxiously "champing at the bit" > > > to purchase the full version of ECS as soon as she will let > > > me. I have been able to get her attention with promises of > > > computer screening and TTS announcements of incoming telephone > > > calls. > > > > >