Subject: From: Date: | Re: [ECS] Unsupported TVL listings Don Stephens Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:10:56 -0800 |
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:10:56 -0800
Tom:
Are you using TZ-? or MDXXXX for the time zone argument? Did you rename your TX-?.CHN
to
MDXXXX.CHN?
The "*" simply indicate favorites in the TV-Guide.
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Hutchins
To: ecs-list@netbloc.com
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 6:19 PM
Subject: [ECS] Unsupported TVL listings
Alright, just when I had everything going just great w/ TVL I went and found another
listing that has the exact cable listing for my area, every single channel!!!
So, off I go to set it up and I run into a small problem. My channels don't seem to
be filtering properly. Here is an example of the chn file:
*02 2WDTN
*03 3WXIX
*06 5WLWT
*57 6TBS
*58 7PAXSAT
77 8RELIG
BTW the listing on Excite uses the channel # and the call letters so 2WDTN is how
it's listed there.
However, all of the channels show up in TV-Guide w/ the Excite channel # not my filtered
#
For example TBS shows up as channel 6 not channel 57
And all of the channels show up even the ones w/o "*"'s.
Any ideas?
Tom
Tom:
Are you using TZ-? or MDXXXX for the time zone
argument? Did you rename your TX-?.CHN to
MDXXXX.CHN?
The "*" simply indicate favorites in the
TV-Guide.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 6:19
PM
Subject: [ECS] Unsupported TVL
listings
Alright, just when I had everything going just great w/ TVL
I went and found another listing that has the exact cable listing for my area,
every single channel!!!
So, off I go to set it up and I run into a small problem. My
channels don't seem to be filtering properly. Here is an example of the chn
file:
*02
2WDTN
*03 3WXIX
*06
5WLWT
*57 6TBS
*58
7PAXSAT
77 8RELIG
BTW the listing on Excite uses the channel # and the call
letters so 2WDTN is how it's listed there.
However, all of the channels show up in TV-Guide w/ the
Excite channel # not my filtered #
For example TBS shows up as channel 6 not channel
57
And all of the channels show up even the ones w/o
"*"'s.
Any ideas?
Tom