|
ECS-L Home Automation and Security Archives |
learn more
| view messages for this
month | NetBloc® | terms of use | search
subject (prev) or (next) |
time (prev) or (next) |
author (prev) or (next) |
view more subjects
Subject: From: Date: | Re: [ECS] Phone-C
don.sb.net.sb.net Mon, 24 Aug 1998 10:53:49 +700 |
On 1998-08-24 ecs-list@vancouver.ml.org said:
>At 09:38 PM 8/23/98 -0400, Michael David wrote:
>>So Mark, if we can get folks together to pitch in, would you be
>>interested in implementing this card for a fee?
>>Anyone have interest in pitching in for this type of project?
>Reddy and I were just discussing the bankrolling of development for
>HAI Omnistat support. Now, up comes phone features!
>That brings up the serious question of how to get the features we
>want and keep Mark alive, cool & well fed! I certainly don't mind
>paying my fair share, but I don't think the people on this list
>and/or the first few people to ask for a feature should have to
>bear the full development cost. I also don't think that Mark wants
>to mess with different compile versions with different feature sets
>enabled. ECS isn't modular, it seems to be all or nothing.
>Anybody else with some ideas?
>I would certainly be interested in kicking in on phone card support,
>provided it is multitasking, not a 'house-stopper' like the
>BigMouth. I am still in DOS land, but I *think* it makes the most
>sense to concentrate development for this in the windows
>environment. This would be a feature that would be worth upgrading
>for (and buying a new PC, if needed). c'ya,
>Wayne
Hey!
I'll go for that, and I think Michael is interested as well. I don't have
a problem with Mark including any of this in the next version of ECS to be
available to everyone. I agree that it would be nice not to have everything
go on hold while the phone events take place. It would be nice to find a
board that would emulate a modem as well, as I'm quickly running out of
space on my motherboard. At any rate I would be willing to put in 100.00
bucks toward this project, if that would help. If the features are really
bitchin' I'd go even higher.
Don
subject (prev) or (next) |
time (prev) or (next) |
author (prev) or (next) |
view more subjects