ECS-L Home Automation and Security Archives
  learn more | view messages for this month | NetBloc® | terms of use | search

Google
 


  subject (prev) or (next) | time (prev) or (next) | author (prev) or (next) | view more subjects

Subject:
From:
Date:
Problem with Leopard touch screen
Nathan Brown
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:09:16 -0700
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:09:16 -0700
I am trying to get my Leopard touch screen, Ocelot, and ECS to talk to
each other.  Here is my configuration:
ECS---Ocelot--------------Leopard
             0 - Master                1 - Slave
 
ECS should be able to return events with a button is pressed and be able
to change screens.  I haven't been able to get them communicating.  I
allways receive the error "ERROR No Module #1".  When I use the CMAX
software, I can make it work, but I can't do it from ECS.  Does anyone
have some experience with this?  I have been doing a lot of hardware
evaluation and these addicon modules seem to fulfull most of my needs,
if I can get them to work.
 
Nathan

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Don Stephens 
	Sent: Wed 9/6/2000 8:02 PM 
	To: ecs-list@netbloc.com 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: [ECS] Does Panasonic Pass Caller-ID?
	
	

	Tell me more!
	
	
	----- Original Message -----
	From: <joerut@epix.net>
	To: "David Kindred" <david@retroscape.com>;
<ecs-list@netbloc.com>
	Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 6:00 PM
	Subject: RE: [ECS] Does Panasonic Pass Caller-ID?
	
	
	> Hello David
	>
	> I know this is a bit late reply but actually I just installed
my phone
	> system this weekend. I have the KX-T61610 and it DOES NOT
	> pass the caller ID info through to the extensions. I did
however
	> figure out a way to have ECS get caller ID info and still be
	> connected to an EXTENSION of the panasonic unit for such
things
	> as paging. It does require a bit of external HARDWARE and some
	> creative programming of the KX-T61610 along with ECS but after
	> what seems to be a confusing time of connecting phone cords
all
	> seems to be working. Let me know if you or anyone else would
like
	> a drawing of this (once I actually draw it out). Like I said
it seems
	> confusing but if analyze the wiring it makes sense.
	>
	>
	> Later
	> Joe Rut
	>
	>
	> On 1 Sep 2000, at 20:15, David Kindred wrote:
	>
	> > So, Don, you're not getting Caller-ID through the modem? Or
do you have
	ECS
	> > "outside" the phone system?
	> >
	> > --David
	> >
	> > -----Original Message-----
	> > From: Don Stephens [ mailto:donstephens@101freeway.com]
	> > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 6:25 PM
	> > To: ecs-list@netbloc.com
	> > Subject: Re: [ECS] Does Panasonic Pass Caller-ID?
	> >
	> >
	> > I have an analog system and the Caller ID plugged into the
line in
	parallel
	> > with the KSU. Seems to work well. Good luck on your project.
	> >
	> > Don
	> >
	> > ----- Original Message -----
	> > From: "David Kindred" <david@retroscape.com>
	> > To: <ecs-list@netbloc.com>
	> > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 11:45 AM
	> > Subject: RE: [ECS] Does Panasonic Pass Caller-ID?
	> >
	> >
	> > > Hey, Don.
	> > >
	> > > I was looking at this combo:
	> > >
	> > >   * KX-TD816 KSU ($844)
	> > >   * KX-TD170 8+8 phone module ($323)
	> > >   * KX-TD193 4-line Caller ID module ($225)
	> > >
	> > > I don't know whether or not I'll do it, because you can
see how
	expensive
	> > it
	> > > is just to get the base unit. System phones are $110 -
$250 each on
	top of
	> > > that. My existing phone system is pretty decent, it just
doesn't pass
	the
	> > > Caller-ID. Maybe I can get one of those old Vive Caller-ID
units and
	put
	> > > that outside of the KSU and let ECS sit on the inside with
the Zoom
	modem.
	> > > I'd rather have an all-in-one solution for answering the
phone and
	getting
	> > > Caller-ID information, because it would seem less
error-prone. But, I
	> > don't
	> > > know what's best.
	> > >
	> > > I'm going to see what the market value is of the two phone
systems I
	have
	> > > before I make any decisions.
	> > >
	> > > --David
	> > >
	> > > -----Original Message-----
	> > > From: Don Stephens [ mailto:donstephens@101freeway.com]
	> > > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 1:11 PM
	> > > To: ecs-list@netbloc.com
	> > > Subject: Re: [ECS] Does Panasonic Pass Caller-ID?
	> > >
	> > >
	> > > What KSU are you looking at? the old 318 did not pass
caller ID as far
	as
	> > I
	> > > know.
	> > >
	> > > Don
	> > > ----- Original Message -----
	> > > From: "David Kindred" <david@retroscape.com>
	> > > To: <ecs-list@netbloc.com>
	> > > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 9:23 AM
	> > > Subject: RE: [ECS] Does Panasonic Pass Caller-ID?
	> > >
	> > >
	> > > > Really? That's great news. Thanks, Hart!
	> > > >
	> > > > --David
	> > > >
	> > > > -----Original Message-----
	> > > > From: hbboyd@mindspring.com [
mailto:hbboyd@mindspring.com]
	> > > > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 12:00 PM
	> > > > To: ecs-list@netbloc.com
	> > > > Subject: Re: [ECS] Does Panasonic Pass Caller-ID?
	> > > >
	> > > >
	> > > > The Panasonic KSU's passes the Caller-ID to all digital
ports and to
	> > only
	> > > > one analog port that you can assign.
	> > > >
	> > > > Hart
	> > > >
	> > > >
	> > >
	> >
	>
	>
	
	


["application/ms-tnef" not shown]
  subject (prev) or (next) | time (prev) or (next) | author (prev) or (next) | view more subjects




Services provided by [NetBloc]®! NetBloc Solutions Inc.
Terms of use. Indexing software (c) 1999 Lin-De, Inc
.