ECS Home Automation and Security Archives
  learn more | view messages for this month | NetBloc® | terms of use | search

Google
 


  subject (prev) or (next) | time (prev) or (next) | author (prev) or (next) | view more subjects

Subject:
From:
Date:
RE: [ecs] 2.3.04 released
Mark Gilmore
Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:04:42 -0700
Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:04:42 -0700
Hi Rob,
Thanks so much for your learned insights :-).

I am porting to Linux for another ECS-related (private label) project.
And since I am already doing the work, I might as well release ECS/Linux
to see how it goes.

RE JAVA/.NET:
Unless critical problems develop, I'll stick with JAVA  (be it Sun and/or 
MS VM).
I have devoted a huge # of manhours into this code, and am extremely wary 
of any
MS-specific solutions. Plus I really REALLY hate Gates. If it costs me $ to 
keep
from further enriching him, that's money well spent. Some might call that 
foolish.
I call it principled :-).

Regards,

At 08:31 AM 8/27/2003 -0600, you wrote:

>Mark,
>
>I noted that in the revision history for 2.3.04 you included some fixes for
>what you characterized as Sun's buggy Java platform. Here are some thoughts
>that, as usual, are probably worth nothing.
>
>Java was Sun's star several years ago. Now, Sun is in trouble. Their
>business has dropped off significantly. Sun has been forced to begin
>focusing on its core business, which has historically been high end
>workstation. As a result, Java has suffered, and in my opinion, is in
>trouble. IBM is actually doing more with Java now than Sun is.
>
>This is one of the reasons I asked some time ago how many of your users
>really care about running ECS on anything but Windows. Nonetheless, I saw
>that you started working on a Linux port. While I love Linux, I doubt too
>many of your users, other than hard core techies, will ever deploy Linux,
>unless it comes preconfigured for them. I think you saw that last time you
>tried. My earlier point was that if you wanted to move your product to one
>that is adopted by the masses, that Windows is probably your platform of
>choice. To achieve widespread adoption, ECS needs to become less techie.
>
>Moreover, while Java at one time was really cool, I think Microsoft's new
>.NET initiative will eclipse it. .NET has a superior development environment
>that supports numerous languages. .NET overcomes much of the slowness
>associated with an interpretive language such as Java, because it uses a
>common language runtime that is compiled once on the target machine.
>
>Anyway, I would encourage you to look at .NET. If ECS were implemented as a
>.NET service on the server, I think that it could potentially benefit from a
>number of .NET services. See
>http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/technologyinfo/default.aspx. However,
>I think ECS could benefit dramatically from .NET on the client. With .NET
>there are two basic ways to go, either a WebForm client that can runs most
>of the client controls on the server, which spits out HTML, or through a
>WinForm client. See http://www.dotnetextreme.com/articles/DotNetClients.asp.
>
>The Smart WinForm client is my choice. I'm working with a company that has
>recently implemented a solution using a Smart WinForm client. The
>programming environment permits rapid development. The GUI is rich and
>interactive. The client is actually being written by a couple of engineers
>in different languages (C# and C++). What's really cool for developers is
>that if they know how to write Java code, C# is a snap to pick up.
>
>Anyway, the client is lightning fast and very small. It is only about 700K
>in size. It runs through firewalls, proxy servers, etc, because it uses port
>80. The downside is that .NET needs to run on the client. New Windows OS'
>are automatically shipping with .NET. Downloads (around 20MB) are available
>for the other platforms, all the way back to Windows 98. It doesn't support
>Windows 95 or Windows 3.x. See
>http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=262d25e3-f589-4842-
>8157-034d1e7cf3a3&DisplayLang=en.
>
>Anyway, I've probably babbled enough.
>
>Let me know what you think.
>
>Regards,
>Rob Hicks
>+1.801.836.0904
>rob.hicks@comcast.net
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Gilmore [mailto:mark@markgilmore.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:08 PM
>To: ecs@netbloc.com
>Subject: [ecs] 2.3.04 released
>
>Hi everyone,
>ECS 2.3.04 has been uploaded to
>http://OmnipotenceSoftware.com/ECS_SETUP.EXE.
>Update history attached.
>For instructions, please see manual ("Installing Updates" section).
>Regards,
>
>Mark Gilmore
>http://OmnipotenceSoftware.com
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003

Mark Gilmore
http://OmnipotenceSoftware.com 



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003


  subject (prev) or (next) | time (prev) or (next) | author (prev) or (next) | view more subjects




Services provided by [NetBloc]®! NetBloc Solutions Inc.
Terms of use. Indexing software (c) 1999 Lin-De, Inc
.